Do Argument Maps Help

Your Critical Thinking?

Studies observing the influence of argument maps on

critical thinking skills have so far shown a lot of promise.

Here are a few of these:

Study 01

Claudia María Álvarez Ortiz from the University of Melbourne found that students who participated in critical thinking courses which used argument mapping tools achieved significant gains in their critical thinking skills. In fact this study observed that the more the students used argument mapping in their course work, the greater their improvement in critical thinking was.

Find out more

Study 02

3 other scientists from the same University of Melbourne- Tim van Gelder, Melanie Bissett and Geoff Cumming taught a critical thinking course through the use of argument mapping. At the end of the course they found significant improvements in their students’ critical thinking skills.

Find out more

Study 03

A study published in the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology compared the critical thinking skills of students who either used or did not use argument maps within a critical thinking course. The study found that those who did use argument mapping scored higher than those who didn’t.

Find out more

Study 04

The Monash University also found similar results, with argument mapping often precisely pinpointing where students were wrong, such as confusing helping premises for separate reasons, making it much easier for them to fix their errors.

Find out more

Sign up to get access now!

Our blog

Latest articles

Critical Thinking in the Workplace

Critical Thinking in the Workplace

The growing importance of critical thinking skills in the workplace and the urgent need for employers to invest in training and development to help their employees improve in this area are undeniable. Without strong critical thinking skills, employees may struggle to make informed decisions, solve complex problems, and adapt to changing circumstances. This can lead to costly mistakes, missed opportunities, and decreased productivity.

Critical Thinking is Different from Debating

Critical Thinking is Different from Debating

Critical thinking is different from debating. It is about more than just winning an argument or convincing others to see things your way. It’s a process of evaluating information, analysing arguments, and making sound decisions based on evidence and reasoning. It requires open-mindedness, scepticism, and a willingness to consider multiple perspectives.

Using Critical Thinking to Explore if Crystals Have Magical Properties

Using Critical Thinking to Explore if Crystals Have Magical Properties

While the belief in the magical properties of crystals has been around for centuries, using critical thinking can help us understand if these properties are real or just a placebo effect. By examining the evidence and applying rational thinking, we can gain a better understanding of the true nature of the supposed magical properties of crystals.